Democrats continue to act like they’re on an entirely different planet from the one conservatives are stuck to. Everyone on the right is shaking their heads in bewilderment as one liberal lawmaker after another goes out of their way to defend criminal activity. Instead of acknowledging that serious crimes have been committed by the FBI, under DOJ direction, and that equally serious reforms are needed, progressives attack the witnesses for exposing the crimes. That proves they’re part of the “Deep State” government-within-a-government conspiracy themselves.
Democrats defend the criminals
House Democrats found an unusual way to defend their criminal colleagues on Thursday, May 18. They’re trying to create a new federal crime out of thin air. “Having the same name as anyone who tweeted derisively about the January 6 Capitol Clash.”
As reported by New York Post, California lawmaker Linda Sanchez was determined to discredit FBI whistleblower Marcus Allen. That’s not surprising because she’s a card-carrying Democrat who also happens to be “vice chair of the House Equality Caucus championing LGBTQI+.”
Sanchez put on an angry look and testy tone to demand an answer from the former FBI Special Agent, about a tweet asserting “Nancy Pelosi staged January 6.” He glared back at her and flatly denied posting that. It wasn’t his account. He told her that repeatedly, using small words even Democrats can understand, which enraged her into berating the witness “for interrupting her tirade.”
Americans should be so incredibly proud of the brave FBI whistleblowers that testified today in Congress.
Thank you gentlemen for your courage and honesty. 🇺🇸
Thank you @Jim_Jordan and @JudiciaryGOP for exposing the weaponization of our American institutions. pic.twitter.com/jv7KSsRC6z
— Moms for Liberty (@Moms4Liberty) May 18, 2023
She was going to blame him for it whether he posted it or not, simply because the account had his name on it. When she finally acknowledged that maybe it wasn’t his account she demanded to know if he agreed with it. “No,” he replied as her time ran out.
Sanchez isn’t the only one on the blue team to attempt covering up the crimes by smearing the witnesses. “This epitomizes how congressional Democrats treated FBI whistleblowers in Thursday’s House Weaponization of the Federal Government Subcommittee hearing,” the Post notes.
For instance, Stacy Plaskett, who doesn’t actually have a vote in Congress because she represents the Virgin Islands, also happens to be the ranking Democrat on the panel. She came unglued, howling “my colleagues on the far right are on a mission to attack, discredit and ultimately dismantle the FBI.” She says that like it’s a bad thing.
Flipping the script
Republicans, Plaskett screamed, “have brought in these former agents, men who lost their security clearances because they were a threat to our national security — who out of malice or ignorance or both have put partisan agenda above the oath they swore to serve this country and protect its national security.” There are a few problems with that statement.
First, they lost their clearances in retaliation for exposing the illegal crimes of their supervisors. They were upholding their oath and protecting national security by exposing the criminal behavior. Democrats won’t even consider the possibility. Who is Plaskett protecting? And Why? What’s in it for her and her fellow progressives? One answer we know for sure. The crimes were all focused on keeping Donald Trump out of the White House. With the implosion about to come, he might be back in sooner than 2024. Now that we know he had 2020 stolen out from under him by the CIA. After Hillary tried to steal it out from under him, with the help of the FBI and DOJ, in 2016.
Thanks to John Durham, we now know that, before the 2016 election, the CIA knew the Clinton campaign was illegally trying to frame Trump with made up charges of Russian collusion and wanted a criminal investigation into it.
FBI whistleblowers explaining why they risked their lives to EXPOSE Regime plot to target political enemies will give you CHILLS:
"We're just trying to do the right thing for this nation and if that means even becoming HOMELESS at the hands of the FBI, we're willing to do that." pic.twitter.com/I8uOruol79
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) May 19, 2023
Instead of investigating, the FBI conspired with Hillary to pull it off. They clearly rigged the election in 2016, look real guilty of helping the CIA rig it in 2020 and appear to be in the middle of rigging 2024. Whether Democrats like that or not, it indicates Donald Trump is really our rightful president, right now.
As the Post points out, “It was unclear Thursday whether congressional Democrats consider FBI critics to be traitors or heretics or maybe both.” They don’t seem to care that one witness, Allen, was an “FBI staff operations specialist who served two tours in Iraq with the Marines.” They really don’t care that he “was suspended without pay after the FBI condemned him for having ‘conspiratorial views in regards to the events of January 6th.’”
His conspiratorial view was that “as part of his research task, he forwarded a link to an open website that said ‘federal law enforcement had some degree of infiltration among the crowds gathered at the Capitol.‘ (Which it did.)” There were more feds than patriots on the ground that fateful day. Some say the entire barbarian invasion was staged by the FBI posing as “Q” to inspire unstable fringe members of the alt-right into crossing a line which could be used to discredit every patriot in America all at once.
