Discrepancies

Breaking: New Election Ballot Discrepancies Arise Out Of Another State

Why are Democrats fighting so hard to put a stop to 2020 Election Audits all over the country? Because it wasn’t only discrepancies with Dominion Voting Machines, or ES&S, it never was. It was always about mail-in voting. Now we add Diebold’s Accuvote to the list of compromised voting machines according to an ongoing audit in New Hampshire.

In the controversial elections in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin one of the chief concerns were “pristine” or un-folded ballots and determining their origin, but an even more fundamental problem has been discovered with mail-in voting: the folds in a mailed ballot. Auditing which is ongoing in New Hampshire has determined that

“if the contest is undervoted, a fold through a vote target can create a vote. “

As frightening as that is, it isn’t even the whole problem according to Harri “scofield” Hursti of WindhamNHAuditors, the firm conducting the New Hampshire audit. Harri tweeted,

According to verifiedvoting.org, the Accuvote system is utilized in New Hampshire, Vermont, Connecticut much of Massachusetts, Mississippi, Illinois, Indiana and scattered counties in Ohio, Missouri, Kansas and Texas.

AccuVote OS Usage Map 2020

The Unbelievable Reveal of New Discrepancies in New Hampshire

The Epoch Times has reported, that the shocking revelation came from the contested election for four seats of the state legislature, all won by Republicans which was contested… get this: by the Democrat candidate who lost. Democrat Kristi St. Lauren requested a recount because she lost by just 24 votes, however, during the hand recount it was revealed that the GOP candidates actually received another 300 votes! And St. Lauren lost another 99! An audit was then ordered. It looks like St. Lauren may have just caused a nightmare for her own party.

Note: New Hampshire Governor authorized this forensic audit in April around the same time that the Arizona State Senate began their efforts, here’s the difference and why the NH audit isn’t nearly as controversial: it was requested by Democrats…

They wrote,

“We now have experimental confirmation that if the contest is undervoted, a fold through a vote target can create a vote. None of the 65 ballots was marked for St. Laurent, but the machines interpreted 25 of the folds as votes for her,” wrote the Twitter account, WindhamNHAuditors, which is operated by auditors Harri Hursti, Mark Lindeman, and Phillip Stark. It later clarified that it was 75 votes, not 65 votes.

“Something we strongly suspect at this juncture, based on various evidence, is that in some cases, fold lines are being interpreted by the scanners as valid votes,” Lindeman, one of the auditors, told WMUR-TV.

WindhamNHAuditors, in another tweet, found that another machine had an “even more dramatic problem” and counted only 28 percent of the 75 votes for each Republican candidate in the contest.

“Because if someone voted for all four Republican candidates and the ballot happened to have its fold line going through St. Laurent’s target, then that might be interpreted by the machines as an overvote, which would then subtract votes from each of those four Republican candidates,” Stark, an auditor, told the station.

“Conversely, if there were not four votes already in that contest by the voter, a fold line through that target could have caused the machine to interpret it as a vote for St. Laurent.”

As 2020 Election audits move forward in Arizona and Georgia, the implications of the results are becoming darker and darker, with allegations of tampering by Maricopa County officials marring the Arizona audit and Fulton County officials working to impede the Georgia audit a single question looms large:

If nothing was wrong with the 2020 Election, then what are the Democrats so afraid Americans finding?

 

2 comments

Comments are closed.

Related Posts