Retaliation against a known whistleblower at the IRS brought forth a second one nobody was aware of. There’s been some sort of an investigation going on into Hunter Biden’s finances but for some reason the investigation never actually got to the point of things like charges. On Monday, Congress got their hands on a stack of documents related to “the purge of the entire investigatory team.” Buried in them was the existence of a second whistleblower.
Another IRS witness
As reported by the New York Post, this new whistleblower “is a special agent in the IRS international tax and financial crimes group and worked on the Hunter Biden case since it opened in 2018.” Last week, the whole team was “ousted without explanation.”
It was later determined that the team was relieved from their duties specifically because someone tattled to Congress. This latest witness “wrote in an email Thursday to seven senior IRS officials, including Commissioner Daniel Werfel, that he believes he was removed for doing the ‘right thing,’ including raising internal alarms about the Justice Department ‘acting inappropriately.’”
Tax fraud is only one of the things Hunter Biden has hanging over his head but everyone’s wondering what takes so long for an IRS investigation to produce any results.
BREAKING: A 2nd IRS whistleblower has come forward after the 5-year long criminal investigation into Hunter Biden was abruptly halted last week.
We are witnessing a coverup right before our eyes.
“As I’m sure you were aware, I was removed this week from a highly sensitive case… pic.twitter.com/yyfmiHQApZ
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) May 23, 2023
This new witness now plans to join his supervisor and “testify behind closed doors before the House Ways and Means Committee on Friday, in publicly registering concerns about how the Justice Department has handled the investigation.” Be sure and tune in to C-Span for that one.
Both of the IRS whistleblowers “expressed concerns internally for years about the case being swept under the rug but got nowhere.” Going behind the backs of their bureaucrat bosses got them in big trouble so they decided to “lay out extensive claims of retaliation in new disclosures to Congress.”
Hunter Biden is believed to have skipped paying taxes “on millions of dollars he received from foreign associates who in some instances interacted with then-Vice President Biden.” They don’t have a box on the 1099 forms for “influence peddling.”
Half split with Joe
One of the nefarious emails which oozed from Hunter Biden’s laptop after he abandoned it in a repair shop indicates that “he had to share ‘half‘ of his income with his father.” The Infernal Revenue Service doesn’t care about that split as long as the IRS gets their cut and they didn’t.
It should have been a routine investigation but it wasn’t. For some reason the name Biden does things to investigations which makes them disappear from sight and collect dust for years at a time.
The unit’s supervisor has been handling the IRS investigation since January of 2020. He was yanked off the case along with a dozen of his subordinates “allegedly on Justice Department orders.” Word was handed down on May 15. That was after the supervisor “contacted Congress on April 19.” That was to allege “preferential treatment” and “false testimony to Congress by Attorney General Merrick Garland.”
Former IRS official testified that in 30 years, he never saw an entire investigatory team pulled off a case. But that's what happened to Hunter's investigators.
Unequal application of law and weaponizing agencies against citizens is becoming routine in Democrat administrations. pic.twitter.com/Y6VKZVer5D
— Senator Ron Johnson (@SenRonJohnson) May 16, 2023
Garland wasn’t happy about that, at all. It’s generally believed that Garland was lying when he swore under oath that the Biden Special Prosecutor, David Weiss, “can unilaterally make charging decisions, even if alleged crimes occurred outside Delaware.”
Fresh documents sent to the congressional watchdogs allege “that investigators were cut out of calls after a contentious meeting in October, where IRS and FBI concerns about inaction in the case emerged, allegedly angering an unnamed U.S. attorney.” Probably Weiss.
“In a charged meeting on October 7, 2022, U.S. Attorney for the District of [redacted] became aware that both the IRS and the FBI had longstanding concerns about the handling of the case. After [redacted] continued to communicate concerns to the [redacted] USAO in a prosecutorial team call on October 17, 2022, he and his IRS team were no longer invited to any further prosecutorial team calls and meetings on the case, effectively excluding them from the case.“
