Hillary Clinton Receives the Brutal News

In November it was widely reported that Hillary Clinton was taking meetings with both Joe Biden and Kamala Harris amongst others in Washington, D.C. Clinton conversely made appearances supporting the administration, but then followed with harsh criticisms suggesting that “we don’t have a Congress that will get things done, and we don’t have a White House that we can count on to be sane and sober and stable and productive.” Many have since speculated that Hillary may seek to enter the 2024 Presidential election or maneuver her own candidate to primary Biden and Harris. Of course, many have asked the question: Why? At 74 years old Clinton seems to be past the post as far as her own political ambitions, but there could be another reason: She doesn’t want to go to jail.

Congresswoman Kat Cammack (R-FL) spoke to Breitbart News in an exclusive interview at Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest in Phoenix, Arizona, she took very direct aim at the Former Senator and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton with a dire warning,

“When we take the House back in the 118th, first and foremost, we are going to be focused on accountability, people need to go to jail,”

“I’m talking about the Hillary Clintons of the world, I’m talking about the Eric Holders, I’m talking about all these people who have continued to cause strife and division, break the law, subvert the Rule of Law, and they have never been held accountable,” the congresswoman added.

“We’re going to go after the origins of COVID-19, we’re going to be looking at how we can earn the trust of the American people back,” Cammack said, “Because for so long, there has been two standards: one for thee, and then rules for the other people that don’t have power, that aren’t well-connected.”

“With Afghanistan now, that’s going to be another one,” she added.

The congresswoman explained that the plan next year is to roll out an agenda “that every single Republican will be running on, campaigning on, and committing to putting that agenda forward.”

“And once we take the House, we roll hard on executing that plan, because the American people they deserve accountability, and they deserve action,” Cammack said. “And those are the two things that we’re going to be giving when we take over the House.”

Hillary Really Might Go To Jail If The Durham Probe Continues

But according to The Conservative Brief, this is only the beginning of Clinton’s troubles as the Durham investigation has begun calling former high ranking FBI officials such as James Baker to testify after  Igor Danchenko, the analyst who provided disgraced ex-British Spy Christopher Steele with the multiple false assertions Steele compiled into the ‘Steele Dossier’ was also indicted November 4th.

“Durham’s team requested that a judge ‘inquire into a potential conflict of interest’ connected to the lawyers for British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s main anti-Trump dossier source, Igor Danchenko, pointing out that a separate lawyer at their firm ‘is currently representing the 2016 ‘Hillary for America’ presidential campaign, as well as multiple former employees of that campaign, in matters before the special counsel,’” Newsmax reported.

“The attorneys who took over as Danchenko’s lawyers this month told Judge Anthony Trenga of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia that Durham’s team was raising questions about Robert Trout, who is of counsel at their firm and previously represented Clinton campaign members, but insisted there is no conflict of interest,” the report continued.

Durham’s team said that there are 5 topics that may become relevant to Danchenko’s defense.

1. “The Clinton campaign’s knowledge or lack of knowledge concerning the veracity of information” in the Steele dossier;

2. “The Clinton campaign’s awareness or lack of awareness” of Danchenko’s “collection methods” for the dossier;

3. “Meetings or communications” between the Clinton campaign and Steele about Danchenko;

4. “The defendant’s knowledge or lack of knowledge regarding the Clinton campaign’s role in” the dossier;

5. “The extent to which the Clinton campaign and/or its representatives directed, solicited, or controlled” Danchenko’s actions.

Durham noted that: “On each of these issues, the interests of the Clinton Campaign and the defendant might diverge. For example, the Clinton Campaign and the defendant each might have an incentive to shift blame and/or responsibility to the other party for any allegedly false information that was contained within the Company Reports and/or provided to the FBI.”

Should the GOP return to power in 2022, then the Durham probe will not only continue but will likely intensify, and Cammack’s prediction may prove salient.

Related Posts