Supreme Court

Supreme Court Rules Against Foundational Leftist Policy

Patriotic Decor

Celebrate Freedom with Patriotic Decor!

Add a touch of American pride to your home with vibrant, high-quality patriotic decor. Perfect for any occasion!

Shop Now!

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

The Supreme Court has certainly not been a friend to the left lately. In a most recent ruling, the Supreme Court dealt a massive blow to the Dem Party. The Court ruled that the affirmative action admission policies of Harvard and the University of North Carolina, which gave weight to a would-be student’s race, are unconstitutional.

Thursday’s 6-3 decision will now force a reworking of admissions criteria throughout American higher education. Possibly ending the institution’s pursuit of diversity above all else.

University officials have long claimed that this was to ensure that a “representative share of minority applicants,” meaning Black students, gains admission to selective institutions. Where once academic levels, no matter the race, were used to select incoming students now it was mainly picked by race alone. 

The court’s six conservative justices invalidated Harvard’s and UNC’s admissions scheme with their current ruling. The Supreme Court ruled that the universities in question did not comply with the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection.

Many minorities, such as those in the Asian community have been severely hurt by these diverse acceptances into high education. Instead of pushing for an overhaul of the education system that seemingly is failing minority and white communities alike progressive educators and lawmakers instead gloss over the true issue and make it instead about the selection of race. 

According to The Wall Street Journal:

The 14th Amendment ensures that individuals receive equal protection of the laws from state agencies including public universities, a standard that also applies to most private colleges that receive federal funding.

In general, the court has permitted racial preferences only to remedy specific acts of illegal discrimination, not to compensate for general social injustices said to stem from historical practices.

For 45 years, the Supreme Court has recognized a limited exception to that rule for university admissions, one based on the schools’ academic freedom to assemble classes that support their educational mission.

Diversity was a compelling interest, the court had found, and race-conscious admissions as implemented at Harvard and similar schools were narrowly tailored to avoid unnecessarily disadvantaging other applicants.

Related Posts